Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 4/17/1882
Roland v. Miller
Citations
- 100 Pa. 47
- 1882 Pa. LEXIS 13
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- employee had necessitous and compelling cause to quit after employer failed to address employee’s complaints of verbal abuse and harassment by co-workers
- fellow employees, including the claimant’s foreman, questioned him as to whether his girlfriend had had a sex change operation, and engaged in other verbal and physical abuse
- claimant testified that “a number of his fellow employees, including his foreman, had questioned him as to whether or not his girlfriend had had a sex change operation and that they often verbally abused him in an extremely derogatory manner and physically pushed him.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gordon, Green, Meecue, Paxson, Sharswood, Sterrett, Trunkey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.