Skip to main content

London v. State

Citations

  • 549 S.E.2d 394
  • 274 Ga. 91
  • 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 2237
  • 2001 Ga. LEXIS 585

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • assuming arguendo that a witness’s prior inconsistent statements were admitted without the proper foundation and applying harmless error analysis
  • admission of hearsay that was cumulative of other evidence elicited at defendant's trial was harmless in light of overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt
  • admission of hearsay that was cumulative of other evidence elicited at defendant's trial was harmless in light of overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt
  • no mention of evidence that injuries caused deceased two-year-old victim pain
  • A defendant may demonstrate reversible error by showing that, if the inadmissible evidence had not been disclosed to the jury, “there existed a reasonable probability that the result of the trial would have been different.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein, Sears

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.