Court of Appeals of Arizona· 10/18/2007
Keonjian v. Olcott
Citations
- 169 P.3d 927
- 216 Ariz. 563
- 515 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 8
- 2007 Ariz. App. LEXIS 196
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the “controlling issue” in determining when the claim accrues is “when [the plaintiff] 4 became aware or should have been aware of the cause of [their] harm” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
- explaining that the resolution of a separate claim that would 25 have provided an offset did not toll statute of limitations
- noting legal malpractice claims generally are tort claims absent “specific promise[s] contained in the contract ... and then only to the extent the claim is premised on the nonperformance of that promise” (citation omitted)
- attorney malpractice cause of action accrued as matter of law when plaintiff made sworn statements concerning attorney’s mishandling of transaction
- attorney malpractice cause of action accrued as matter of law when plaintiff made sworn statements concerning attorney‟s mishandling of transaction
- “In the majority of malpractice cases, the damage or 24 injury occurs contemporaneously with the malpractice.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vásquez, Eckerstrom, Espinosa
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Best Choice Fund, LLC v. Low & Childers, P.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-01-06· cited 34×
- Melinda S. Workman v. Verde Wellness Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-10-18· cited 30×
- Cannon v. Hirsch Law Office, P.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-07-14· cited 26×
- Little v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-09-30· cited 17×
- Kaufman v. JesserD. Arizona· 2012-07-19· cited 6×
- Hayenga v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-02-12· cited 3×
- Little v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-09-30
- Todd Underwood v. Thomas Wilczynski and Dana Wilczynski Janet A. Bewley...Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2021-12-16
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hill-Shafer Partnership v. Chilson Family TrustArizona Supreme Court· 1990-09-18· cited 106×
- Logerquist v. DanforthCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-10-03· cited 84×
- Amfac Distribution Corp. v. MillerArizona Supreme Court· 1983-11-17· cited 78×
- Amfac Distribution Corp. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-07-06· cited 60×
- Glaze v. LarsenArizona Supreme Court· 2004-01-14· cited 55×
- Kiley v. Jennings, Strouss & SalmonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-04-23· cited 49×
- CDT, Inc. v. Addison, Roberts & Ludwig, C.P.A., P.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-08-24· cited 40×
- Commercial Union Insurance v. Lewis & RocaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-02-21· cited 39×
- Benard v. WalkupCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1969-05-06· cited 34×
- Long v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-04-02· cited 33×
- Collins v. Miller & Miller, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-12-24· cited 27×
- Hill v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-01-28· cited 22×
- Beane v. Tucson Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-12-07· cited 14×
- Towns v. FreyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-03-10· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.