N.D. Illinois· 10/7/1988
Johnson v. Johnson
Citations
- 701 F. Supp. 1363
- 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11427
- 1988 WL 130361
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying discovery rule in case alleging delayed recollection of childhood sexual abuse
- applying discovery rule in case alleging delayed recollection of childhood sexual abuse
- discovery rule applied when plaintiff had no memory of the alleged incidents of sexual abuse during her childhood
- “The point at which the statute of limitations commences under the discovery rule is a question of fact.”
- applies discovery rule in a case where an adult survivor had no memory of childhood sexual abuse until after the expiration of the statute of limitations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Plunkett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- S.V. v. R.V.Texas Supreme Court· 1996-03-14· cited 816×
- Doe v. First United Methodist ChurchOhio Supreme Court· 1994-03-30· cited 174×
- Clay v. KuhlIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-01-21· cited 165×
- Doe v. RoeArizona Supreme Court· 1998-04-07· cited 160×
- Dalrymple v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-12-11· cited 149×
- Petersen v. BruenNevada Supreme Court· 1990-05-10· cited 120×
- Hearndon v. GrahamSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-09-14· cited 100×
- Schmidt v. BishopS.D. New York· 1991-12-06· cited 96×
- Logerquist v. DanforthCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-10-03· cited 84×
- Farris v. ComptonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-12-29· cited 74×
- E.J.M. v. Archdiocese of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-04-07· cited 62×
- Lovelace v. KeohaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1992-04-20· cited 57×
- O'NEAL v. Division of Family ServicesUtah Supreme Court· 1991-08-27· cited 54×
- Travis v. ZiterSupreme Court of Alabama· 1996-07-12· cited 49×
- Callahan v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1990-12-19· cited 47×
- Baily v. LewisE.D. Pennsylvania· 1991-05-06· cited 44×
- Franke v. GeyerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1991-03-06· cited 39×
- Phillips v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-08-26· cited 39×
- Hildebrand v. HildebrandS.D. Indiana· 1990-05-07· cited 37×
- Hertel v. SullivanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-04-07· cited 37×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Knox College v. Celotex Corp.Illinois Supreme Court· 1981-11-13· cited 605×
- Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court· 1969-05-26· cited 360×
- Witherell v. WeimerIllinois Supreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 325×
- Nolan v. Johns-Manville AsbestosIllinois Supreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 325×
- Tom Olesker's Exciting World of Fashion, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court· 1975-09-24· cited 208×
- DeRose v. CarswellCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-12-07· cited 107×
- Tyson v. TysonWashington Supreme Court· 1986-10-30· cited 106×
- Ew v. DchMontana Supreme Court· 1988-05-03· cited 76×
- North Coast Air Services, Ltd. v. Grumman Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1988-07-15· cited 69×
- Fure v. Sherman HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois· 1978-09-25· cited 52×
- Thornton v. Mono Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-08-20· cited 52×
- Tucek v. GrantAppellate Court of Illinois· 1984-12-10· cited 34×
- Raymond v. IngramCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-05-26· cited 32×
- Guebard v. JabaayAppellate Court of Illinois· 1978-10-18· cited 31×
- Lincoln-Way Community High School District 210 v. Village of FrankfortAppellate Court of Illinois· 1977-08-23· cited 29×
- Anabaldi v. Sunbeam Corp.N.D. Illinois· 1987-01-27· cited 13×
- In Re Marriage of WanicAppellate Court of Illinois· 1983-02-14· cited 6×
- Kaiser v. MillimanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-01-06· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.