Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 3/30/2016

Logan v. Matveevskii

Citations

  • 175 F. Supp. 3d 209
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42546
  • 2016 WL 1267798

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing FHA claim where there was “simply nothing other than Plaintiff’s legal conclusions in the [complaint] from which the court could surmise that ‘animus against the [disabled] was a significant factor’ in any position taken by Defendants”
  • “[B]ecause the preclusive effect of a New York state court decision is asserted, the Court must consider New York’s law of res judicata.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Karas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.