Ajit Bhogaita v. Altamonte Heights Condominium Assn., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the FHA should still be interpreted in line with the preamendment ADA
• concluding that a reasonable factfinder could conclude that the complainant’s dog alleviates the symptoms of his post-traumatic stress disorder
• holding that the FHA should still be interpreted in line with the preamendment ADA
• explaining that the abuse of discretion standard implies a range of choices that is particularly broad with respect to Rule 403 determinations
• holding that letters from the plaintiff’s physician which explained the nature of the plaintiff’s disability, that plaintiff’s disability impaired a major life activity, and that plaintiff’s dog alleviated his symptoms, were sufficient to show the requested accommodation was necessary
• noting that disability scholars prefer use of the term disability, and the Americans with Disabilities Act reflects that preference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).