Locklear v. Bergman & Beving AB

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that § 9-902(d) “does not postpone the accrual of an injured employee’s cause of action . . . but, rather, merely interrupts the running of limitations for a period of two months after his first award.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Global Crossing v. Alta Partners Holdings LDC (In Re Global Crossing Ltd.)
  S.D. New York· 2008-04-08· cited 15×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schiavone v. Fortune
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-18· cited 857×
• Jacobsen v. Osborne
  Fifth Circuit· 1998-01-16· cited 294×
• Cox v. Treadway
  Sixth Circuit· 1996-01-25· cited 260×
• James Wood, Cross v. Allen Worachek, Cross
  Seventh Circuit· 1980-04-08· cited 186×
• Margot Rendall-Speranza v. Edward A. Nassim
  D.C. Circuit· 1997-03-14· cited 169×
• Wayne v. Jarvis
  Eleventh Circuit· 1999-12-08· cited 122×
• Wilson v. United States Government
  First Circuit· 1994-05-04· cited 120×
• Gregory Baskin v. City of Des Plaines, a Municipal Corporation, and Bruce Sotirakis, Individually and in His Official Capacity
  Seventh Circuit· 1998-03-17· cited 89×
• Western Contracting Corp. v. Bechtel Corp.
  Fourth Circuit· 1989-09-18· cited 54×
• Turner v. Smalis, Inc.
  D. Maryland· 1985-11-21· cited 7×
• Barnes v. Prince George's County
  D. Maryland· 2003-05-08· cited 6×
• Hayes v. Wang
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-01-03· cited 5×