Wilson v. United States Government

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that ‘Wilson fully intended to sue GEGS”
• denying relation-back when injured seaman sued employer, rather than owner of vessel, because seaman lacked knowledge of proper party
• denying relation-back when injured seaman sued employer, rather than owner of vessel, because seaman lacked knowledge of proper party
• finding that an amended pleading did not relate back because Rule 15(c)(3
• stating that the doctrine of equitable tolling applies to the SAA
• stating that the doctrine of equitable tolling applies to § 745

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).