Skip to main content

In Re Kellogg-Brown & Root, Inc.

Citations

  • 45 S.W.3d 772
  • 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 2977
  • 2001 WL 491933

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering that the admissions at issue would “vitiate any substantive defense” the party might have had in concluding that presentation of the merits will be served
  • “[b]ecause the ultimate purpose of discovery is to seek the truth, . . . we conclude that the presentation of the merits of the case would be served by withdrawal” of the deemed admissions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Worthen, Griffith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.