E.D. Michigan· 3/31/1997
Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. Smith
Citations
- 172 F.R.D. 236
- 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6989
- 1997 WL 157555
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A Rule 23 determination is wholly procedural and has nothing to do with whether a plaintiff will ultimately prevail on the substantive merits of its claims.” (citation omitted)
- “A Rule 23 determination is wholly procedural and has nothing to do with whether a plaintiff will ultimately prevail on the substantive merits of its claims.” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gadola
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationS.D. Florida· 2004-04-08· cited 81×
- In re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationE.D. Michigan· 2001-03-14· cited 80×
- In re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationE.D. Michigan· 2001-04-03· cited 44×
- Olden v. LaFarge Corp.E.D. Michigan· 2001-10-24· cited 41×
- Wyeth, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama· 2010-01-15· cited 40×
- Swigart v. Fifth Third BankS.D. Ohio· 2012-12-28· cited 34×
- Rankin v. RotsE.D. Michigan· 2004-04-16· cited 33×
- Larsen v. Union Bank, N.A.S.D. Florida· 2011-07-25· cited 23×
- In re Checking Account Overdraft LitigationS.D. Florida· 2012-08-10· cited 20×
- In re Checking Account Overdraft LitigationS.D. Florida· 2015-06-08· cited 18×
- Taylor v. CSX Transportation, Inc.N.D. Ohio· 2007-09-28· cited 15×
- In re Tableware Antitrust LitigationN.D. California· 2007-03-13· cited 10×
- Bobbitt v. Academy of Court Reporting, Inc.E.D. Michigan· 2008-06-25· cited 8×
- Barnes v. First American Title Ins. Co.N.D. Ohio· 2007-02-07· cited 5×
- Durant v. Servicemaster Co.E.D. Michigan· 2002-06-10· cited 3×
- Klender v. United StatesE.D. Michigan· 2003-06-18· cited 3×
- NATIONAL SECURITY FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY v. Maurice DeWITTSupreme Court of Alabama· 2011-11-18· cited 2×
- In re CMS Energy Securities LitigationE.D. Michigan· 2006-03-24· cited 2×
- Bobbitt v. Academy of Court Reporting, Inc.E.D. Michigan· 2008-05-01· cited 1×
- Lussier v. Subaru of N.E., et al.D. New Hampshire· 2001-08-03· cited 1×
Cites
61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court· 1986-01-27· cited 28,671×
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsSixth Circuit· 1981-01-20· cited 6,283×
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 3,301×
- Eloise HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1991-05-06· cited 3,067×
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 1992-06-08· cited 1,717×
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-03-10· cited 1,658×
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 1,290×
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 1,058×
- Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court· 1984-03-27· cited 891×
- Blackie v. BarrackNinth Circuit· 1975-09-25· cited 871×
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1953-05-25· cited 844×
- 12 Fair empl.prac.cas. 451, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,741 John Senter, Cross-Appellee v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppellantSixth Circuit· 1976-03-01· cited 628×
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Third Circuit· 1977-07-21· cited 553×
- Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court· 1969-04-07· cited 546×
- Eisenberg v. GagnonThird Circuit· 1985-06-28· cited 452×
- Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationSixth Circuit· 1988-10-20· cited 445×
- Esplin v. HirschiTenth Circuit· 1968-09-30· cited 393×
- Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 371×
- Bernard v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court· 1969-03-24· cited 325×
- Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp.First Circuit· 1994-09-15· cited 321×
Other cases named Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. Smith
5 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. SmithE.D. Michigan· 1998-09-30· cited 12×
- Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. SmithE.D. Michigan· 1995-08-07· cited 8×
- Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. SmithE.D. Michigan· 1998-09-30
- Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. SmithE.D. Michigan· 1996-02-16
- Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. SmithE.D. Michigan· 1998-09-30
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.