· 1/16/1992
Lipton v. the Nature Co.
Citations
- 781 F. Supp. 1032
- 21 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1944
- 1992 WL 13880
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 480
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding, post-Feist, that a compilation of terms of venery from Middle English was protectable under the Copyright Act because, inter alia, there was originality in the selection both of the terms and the translations
- non-resident defendant that commits copyright infringement through sales by independent brokers or retail agents subject to jurisdiction under tortious act provision of New York’s long-arm statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Owen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.