Skip to main content
· 1/16/1992

Lipton v. the Nature Co.

Citations

  • 781 F. Supp. 1032
  • 21 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1944
  • 1992 WL 13880
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 480

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding, post-Feist, that a compilation of terms of venery from Middle English was protectable under the Copyright Act because, inter alia, there was originality in the selection both of the terms and the translations
  • non-resident defendant that commits copyright infringement through sales by independent brokers or retail agents subject to jurisdiction under tortious act provision of New York’s long-arm statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Owen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.