Dennis W. Eckes and James Beckett, III v. Card Prices Update and Suffolk Collectables

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \[o]nly the knowing failure to advise the Copyright Office of facts which might have occasioned a rejection of the application constitute[s] reason for holding the registration invalid and thus incapable of supporting an infringement action\
• noting that “sweat of a researcher’s brow” does not merit copyright protection
• upholding finding of infringement because list of premium cards \subjectively based\
• copying of judgmental selection of “premium” baseball cards is an infringement
• \Only the 'knowing failure to advise the Copyright Office of facts which might have occasioned a rejection of the application constitutes reason for holding the registration invalid' \
• \Only the `knowing failure to advise the Copyright Office of facts which might have occasioned a rejection of the application constitute[s] reason for holding the registration invalid' \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).