Lipton v. The Nature Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the defendant’s statement that the research he conducted was “thorough! ]” was mere puffing and not actionable under the Lanham Act
• statement in promotional brochures that advertiser conducted “thorough research” held to be non-actionable puffery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).