Linton v. Linton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that distribution to each party of trust assets resulted in “the manner of their holding the property changing] but this cannot be said to be a substantial change of circumstances” for modification of spousal maintenance
• “The mere fact of reduction of income in and of itself is not a sufficient basis to justify modification of the decree.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Scott v. Scott
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1979-02-28· cited 35×
• Burnette v. Bender
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-12-19· cited 27×
• Chaney v. Chaney
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-04-25· cited 16×
• Fletcher v. Fletcher
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-10-19· cited 11×
• Hornbaker v. Hornbaker
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-02-13· cited 9×
• Reeves v. Reeves
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-05-02· cited 7×
• Marquez v. Marquez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-04-29· cited 6×
• Marce v. Bailey
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-09-28· cited 6×
• Snow v. Snow
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-10-27· cited 5×
• Alford v. Alford
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-07-25· cited 5×
• Jorgensen v. Jorgensen
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-12-11· cited 2×
• McClendon v. McClendon
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-12-07

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kennedy v. Kennedy
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1963-03-27· cited 39×
• Nace v. Nace
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-09-30· cited 24×
• Norton v. Norton
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1966-12-05· cited 22×
• Sheeley v. Sheeley
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-09-16· cited 16×