Jorgensen v. Jorgensen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• modification allowed because subsequent change in income found not within the contemplation of the parties at the time of their separation agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chaney v. Chaney
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-04-25· cited 16×
• In Re Palidora
  D. Arizona· 2004-05-24· cited 3×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jarvis v. Jarvis
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-07-08· cited 41×
• In Re the Marriage of Rowe
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1978-01-05· cited 23×
• Patterson v. Patterson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1967-09-29· cited 23×
• Linton v. Linton
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-07-11· cited 21×
• Holesinger v. Holesinger
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1961-01-11· cited 16×
• Beck v. Jaeger
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-10-10· cited 10×
• Hornbaker v. Hornbaker
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-02-13· cited 9×
• Beddoes v. Beddoes
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1964-06-08· cited 6×
• Alford v. Alford
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-07-25· cited 5×