Skip to main content
· 9/16/1969

Sheeley v. Sheeley

Citations

  • 458 P.2d 522
  • 10 Ariz. App. 318
  • 1969 Ariz. App. LEXIS 580

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “An increase in the earning capacity of the husband after the divorce, standing alone, however, is not sufficient. A former wife has no continuing right to share in future accumulations of wealth by her divorced husband.”
  • ‘‘An increase in the earning capacity of the husband after the divorce, standing alone . . . is not sufficient [reason to modify an alimony award]. A former wife has no continuing right to share in future accumulations of wealth by her divorced husband.’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.