W.D. Missouri· 6/18/1986
Linquist v. Bowen
Citations
- 633 F. Supp. 846
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- class members were not required to exhaust administrative remedies when challenging administrative policy, and thus, court would not define class to include only those who had exhausted remedies
- \primary purpose...was income replacement for the disabled worker\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bartlett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit Corp.D. Kansas· 1991-05-10· cited 34×
- Dale v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-06-30· cited 26×
- Linquist v. BowenEighth Circuit· 1987-03-09· cited 23×
- Laclede Cab Co. v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsMissouri Court of Appeals· 1988-03-08· cited 16×
- Weaver v. ReagenW.D. Missouri· 1988-09-29· cited 15×
- Wakefield v. Monsanto Co.E.D. Missouri· 1988-05-18· cited 9×
- Linquist v. BowenEighth Circuit· 1987-06-03· cited 8×
- WOMEN'S HEALTH CTR. OF WEST CTY. v. WebsterE.D. Missouri· 1987-09-24· cited 8×
- Darling v. BowenW.D. Missouri· 1988-05-12· cited 7×
- Rentschler v. CarnahanE.D. Missouri· 1995-02-10· cited 5×
- Marcus v. Kansas, Department of RevenueD. Kansas· 2002-05-01· cited 4×
- Glen Lewy 1990 Trust v. Investment Advisors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-09-03· cited 3×
- Enekosi v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionerHigh Court of American Samoa· 1987-10-20
Cites
52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 4,909×
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 4,229×
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 2,721×
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 2,470×
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court· 1940-05-27· cited 2,271×
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court· 1980-03-19· cited 1,936×
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 1,888×
- Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantEighth Circuit· 1984-07-17· cited 1,741×
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1892-02-29· cited 1,398×
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 1,115×
- United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court· 1981-02-23· cited 1,058×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1975-02-25· cited 621×
- Richard JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEORGIA HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1969-12-16· cited 530×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,265 Fred Zeidman and Steven Youngelson v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1981-07-27· cited 327×
- Norton Ex Rel. Chiles v. MathewsSupreme Court· 1976-06-29· cited 304×
- Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantEighth Circuit· 1984-12-31· cited 254×
- Marceline M. DONALDSON and Others Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. the PILLSBURY COMPANY Et Al., AppelleesEighth Circuit· 1977-05-09· cited 203×
- Perry v. Commerce Loan Co.Supreme Court· 1966-03-21· cited 176×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.