Skip to main content
· 6/18/1986

Linquist v. Bowen

Citations

  • 633 F. Supp. 846

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • class members were not required to exhaust administrative remedies when challenging administrative policy, and thus, court would not define class to include only those who had exhausted remedies
  • \primary purpose...was income replacement for the disabled worker\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bartlett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.