Linear Technology Corp. v. International Trade Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to add negative lim- itation to claim where “there is no basis in the patent spec- ification”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.
  Federal Circuit· 2011-07-08· cited 95×
• Eko Brands, LLC v. Adrian Rivera Maynez Enters.
  Federal Circuit· 2020-01-13· cited 77×
• Comaper Corp. v. Antec, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-03-01· cited 52×
• Vasudevan Software, Inc. v. Tibco Software, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2015-04-03· cited 46×
• Vizio, Inc. v. International Trade Commission
  Federal Circuit· 2010-05-26· cited 25×
• Volterra Semiconductor Corp. v. Primarion, Inc.
  N.D. California· 2011-05-04· cited 8×
• General Electric Co. v. International Trade Commission
  Federal Circuit· 2012-07-06· cited 4×
• Retractable Techs. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.
  Federal Circuit· 2011-07-08· cited 3×
• General Electric Co. v. International Trade Commission
  Federal Circuit· 2012-02-29· cited 3×
• Crown Packaging Technology, Inc. v. Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp.
  S.D. Ohio· 2009-09-08· cited 2×
• Bureau National Interprofessionnel Du Cognac v. Cologne & Cognac Entertainment
  Federal Circuit· 2024-08-06· cited 2×
• Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
  E.D. Texas· 2010-02-16· cited 1×
• MiTile, Ltd. v. Hasbro, Inc.
  E.D. Virginia· 2013-10-30· cited 1×
• Cohesive Tech. Inc. v. Waters Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-10-15
• Alloc, Inc. v. Pergo, L.L.C
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2010-09-30
• Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. Itc
  Federal Circuit· 2021-05-28
• Nrdc v. Usepa
  Ninth Circuit· 2022-06-17
• Emtel, Inc. v. Lipidlabs, Inc.
  S.D. Texas· 2012-10-31

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
  Supreme Court· 1938-12-05· cited 12,026×
• Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 2004-02-11· cited 685×
• Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.
  Federal Circuit· 2002-08-30· cited 652×
• Continental Can Company Usa, Inc. And Continental Pet Technologies, Inc. v. Monsanto Company, Hoover Universal, Inc. And Johnson Controls, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1991-12-26· cited 310×
• Ssih Equipment S.A. v. United States International Trade Commission and Stewart-Warner Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 1983-07-15· cited 288×
• Joy Technologies, Inc., and A/s Niro Atomizer, Involuntary v. Flakt, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1993-10-06· cited 255×
• BMC Resources, Inc. v. Paymentech, L.P.
  Federal Circuit· 2007-09-20· cited 203×
• Transmatic, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Gulton Industries, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1995-07-05· cited 173×
• Net MoneyIN, Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-10-20· cited 171×
• Home Diagnostics, Inc. v. Lifescan, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2004-10-22· cited 166×
• Liquid Dynamics Corp. v. Vaughan Company, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2006-06-01· cited 132×
• Cohesive Technologies, Inc. v. Waters Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-10-07· cited 112×
• Honeywell International, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, and Hyosung Corporation and Hyosung (America), Inc., Intervenors
  Federal Circuit· 2003-10-23· cited 105×
• Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2001-09-10· cited 104×
• Brookhill-Wilk 1, LLC v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2003-06-27· cited 102×
• 3m Innovative Properties Company and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Avery Dennison Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2004-01-20· cited 89×
• Tegal Corporation v. Tokyo Electron America, Inc. Tegal Corporation v. Tokyo Electron America, Inc. Tegal Corporation v. Tokyo Electron America, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2001-07-16· cited 75×
• Free Motion Fitness, Inc. v. Cybex International, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2005-09-16· cited 55×
• Slip Track Systems, Inc. And Todd A. Brady v. Metal-Lite, Inc., Thomas R. Herren, and Gene N. Carpenter, Defendants-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 2002-09-11· cited 55×
• International Rectifier Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross v. Ixys Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2004-04-29· cited 54×