Skip to main content
· 7/8/2011

Retractable Techs. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.

Citations

  • 659 F.3d 1369

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is not for the court to tailor the claim language to the invention disclosed. The language is the language . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rader, Chief Judge, and Plager and Lourie, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.