Skip to main content
· 10/23/2003

Honeywell International, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, and Hyosung Corporation and Hyosung (America), Inc., Intervenors

Citations

  • 341 F.3d 1332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming determination of indefiniteness where test results varied greatly depending on which sample preparation method was used and intrinsic evidence did not “lead one of ordinary skill in the art to a particular sample preparation method”
  • finding as insufficient expert testimony supportive of a construction untainted by indefiniteness when the intrinsic evidence failed to provide “guidance as to what one of ordinary skill in the art would interpret the claim to require.”
  • “Because the sample preparation method is critical in determining MPE, processes utilizing different sample preparation methods will produce different yarns”
  • involving percent volume of wood flour

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lourie, Gajarsa, Linn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.