Skip to main content
· 8/26/2005

Lillis v. AT&T CORP.

Citations

  • 896 A.2d 871
  • 2005 WL 5750582
  • 2005 Del. Ch. LEXIS 130

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[J]udicial admissions apply only to admissions of fact, not to theories of law, such as contract interpretation.”
  • “judicial admissions apply only to admissions of fact, not to theories of law, such as contract interpretation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lamb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.