Lillis v. AT & T CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[U]nder Delaware law, the phrases . . . ‘relating to,’ and ‘arising out of,’ . . . are paradigmatically broad terms.”
• “As this court has noted previously, judgment on the pleadings . . . is a proper framework for enforcing unambiguous contracts because there is no need to resolve material disputes of fact.”
• “What the court must do to resolve this case, therefore, is to decide Whether the contract at issue is in any Way ambiguous . . . If the contract’s meaning is unambiguous, the court must grant judgment on the pleadings in favor of the moving party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).