Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Gemma

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, at the motion to dismiss stage, that dismissal of an unjust enrichment claim was improper when the parties dispute the enforceability of the contract provision at issue
• allowing tortious interference claim where plaintiff insurer had long-standing relationship with real estate company that would refer its customers to plaintiff
• permitting tortious interference claim where plaintiff had a relationship with a real estate company that would refer customers to plaintiff
• finding adequality pled facts for unjust enrichment claim where plaintiff retained documents in an unjust fashion that was outside the scope of their employment contract
• plaintiff alleged adequate consideration for all restrictive covenants in post-employment agreement in form of bonus compensation plan
• established referral relationships that were the “lifeblood” of the business were also sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).