Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \specific intent to harm does not magically create standing or cause ... injuries to be direct\
• noting that “specific intent to harm does not magically create standing or cause ... injuries to be direct”
• dismissing state law fraud and negligent misrepresentation claims for lack of proximate causation when RICO claims failed for same reasons
• dismissing state claims based on the \same principles that lead us to conclude that plaintiffs' antitrust and RICO claims were properly dismissed\: lack of proximate cause
• rejecting an antitrust claim where the \injuries [were] too remotely connected in the causal chain from wrongdoing\
• barring unjust enrichment recovery from a party who was not the primary beneficiary and who only benefitted incidentally

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).