Skip to main content

Lopez v. State

Citations

  • 555 So. 2d 1298
  • 1990 WL 4561

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court must follow the statute and impose the mandatory fine
  • repeated references to defendant as a drug dealer who was lying on the stand is improper argument
  • “language of [section 835.135(1)(b)3.] concerning the mandatory fine neither equivocates nor gives discretion to the trial court”
  • comments did not deprive appellant of a fair trial nor materially contribute to his conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baskin, Levy and Gersten

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.