Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 11/14/2012
Lewis v. Lewis
Citations
- 400 S.C. 354
- 734 S.E.2d 322
- 2012 S.C. App. LEXIS 332
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting South Carolina courts have determined joint custody \is usually considered harmful to and not conducive to the best interest and welfare of a child\
- noting South Carolina courts have determined joint custody \is usually considered harmful to and not conducive to the best interest and welfare of a child\
- finding divided custody is not in best interest of the child when there is an \acrimonious relationship between Husband and Wife\
- noting parties' uncooperative behavior that prolongs litigation can justify holding each responsible for his or her attorney's fees
- finding any error in the family court's determination concerning the counselor's knowledge of the husband's behavior was harmless because the finding was not \any more damaging to [the h]usband than the other evidence presented\
- \[T]he welfare and best interests of the child are the primary considerations in determining visitation.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Geathers, Huff, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Stoney v. SRSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-12-20· cited 175×
- Clark v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-05-02· cited 22×
- Schultze v. SchultzeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-04-17· cited 12×
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-04-08· cited 10×
- Stoney v. StoneySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-12-20· cited 7×
- Teeter v. TeeterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-03-05· cited 7×
- Ward v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-10-30· cited 4×
- Burgess v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-01-15· cited 3×
- Burgess v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-01-24· cited 1×
- Tomlinson v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-11-06
- Sellers v. NichollsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-08-05
- Sellers v. NichollsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-12-02
- Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-07-07
- Elena V. Glinyanay v. William A. TobiasCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2022-02-09
- Jeffrey Fossett v. Melissa FossettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2023-07-05
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-05-09· cited 543×
- Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-05-09· cited 337×
- E.D.M. v. T.A.M.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-03-16· cited 274×
- Patel v. PatelSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-05-24· cited 145×
- McCall v. FinleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-10-26· cited 93×
- Spreeuw v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-07-29· cited 62×
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-04-14· cited 59×
- Patel v. PatelSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-10-31· cited 52×
- Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-02-08· cited 32×
- Mixson v. MixsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1969-12-18· cited 31×
- Gartside v. GartsideCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-04-29· cited 29×
- Paparella v. PaparellaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-04-17· cited 22×
- Chisholm v. ChisholmSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-02-01· cited 22×
- McComb v. ConardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-08-24· cited 19×
- Anderson v. TolbertCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-07-01· cited 16×
- Marchant v. MarchantCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-09-01· cited 15×
- Sanderson v. SandersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-12-22· cited 15×
- Blackwell v. FulgumCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-09· cited 14×
- Lewin v. LewinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-12-14· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.