Chisholm v. Chisholm

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that on appeal, \[the appellate court] review[s] the family court's grant of attorney's fees de novo\
• holding the decision to award attorney's fees is within the family court's discretion and although appellate review is de novo, the appellant still has the burden to show the family court erred
• holding the decision to award attorney's fees is within the family court's discretion and although appellate review is de novo, the appellant still has the burden to show the family court erred
• stating that although an appellate court exercises de novo review of attorney's fees awards in domestic relations cases, the appellant must show the preponderance of the evidence is against the family court's findings of fact
• reviewing the family court's decision in awarding attorney's fees under a de novo standard of review
• reviewing the family court's discretion in awarding attorney's fees under a de novo standard of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lewis v. Lewis
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-11-14· cited 41×
• Stone v. Thompson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-07-24
• Elena V. Glinyanay v. William A. Tobias
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2022-02-09

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lewis v. Lewis
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-05-09· cited 543×
• Upchurch v. Upchurch
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-01-03· cited 46×
• Miles v. Miles
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-05-31· cited 44×
• Mazzone v. Miles
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-06-12· cited 22×
• Myers v. Myers
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-01-20· cited 21×