Tenth Circuit· 7/30/2008

Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Liebert Corp.

Citations

535 F.3d 1146
2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 16119
2008 WL 2908933

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing duty to disclose between two parties who directly contracted for the sale and purchase of batteries
observing that verdict reversal is appropriate only if jury “might have based its verdict” on a “legally erroneous jury instruction” (quotations omitted)
explaining that under Colorado law, courts must examine contractual terms and accept to determine the intent of the parties
noting that “[c]ourts in Colorado ‘have found the conduct of the parties before the controversy arose to be a reliable test of their interpretation of the agreement’”
explaining that under Colorado law, an independent tort duty “serves as the boundary between contract and tort law, permitting only those tort claims that allege such a duty has been breached”
providing that we interpret contracts to give effect to all provisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, McKáy, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.