· 6/13/2006
World Wide Ass'n of Specialty Programs v. Pure, Inc.
Citations
- 450 F.3d 1132
- 70 Fed. R. Serv. 457
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 14418
- 2006 WL 1617318
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that preponderance of the evidence is a lower evidentiary standard than clear and convincing
- noting that every element of a Lanham Act claim must be proved by a preponderance of the evidence
- “In performing the 403 balancing, the court should give the evidence its maximum reasonable probative force and its minimum reasonable prejudicial value.” (quotation omitted)
- “[I]n order for World Wide to succeed on [a] claim under the Lanham Act, it was required to demonstrate the ... elements by a preponderance of the evidence[ ]____”
- public figure determination is question of law reviewed de novo
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tacha, McWilliams, O'Brien
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.