Skip to main content
· 6/13/2006

World Wide Ass'n of Specialty Programs v. Pure, Inc.

Citations

  • 450 F.3d 1132
  • 70 Fed. R. Serv. 457
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 14418
  • 2006 WL 1617318

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that preponderance of the evidence is a lower evidentiary standard than clear and convincing
  • noting that every element of a Lanham Act claim must be proved by a preponderance of the evidence
  • “In performing the 403 balancing, the court should give the evidence its maximum reasonable probative force and its minimum reasonable prejudicial value.” (quotation omitted)
  • “[I]n order for World Wide to succeed on [a] claim under the Lanham Act, it was required to demonstrate the ... elements by a preponderance of the evidence[ ]____”
  • public figure determination is question of law reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tacha, McWilliams, O'Brien

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.