Ninth Circuit· 10/21/1986
Letizia v. Prudential Bache Securities, Inc.
Citations
- 802 F.2d 1185
- 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 32454
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that the company “clearly indicated its intention to protect its employees” by means of the arbitration provision
- finding that all the individual defendants’ allegedly wrongful acts related to their employment responsibilities
- determining that the company \clearly indicated its intention to protect its employees\ by means of the arbitration provision
- finding that all the individual defendants' allegedly wrongful acts related to their employment responsibilities
- agreeing to arbitrate disputes “arising out of or relating to” plaintiff’s securities account
- agreeing with other circuit courts that “have held consistently that nonsignatories 14 of arbitration agreements may be bound by the agreement under ordinary contract and 15 agency principles.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Canby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McCarthy v. AzureFirst Circuit· 1994-04-28· cited 270×
- Kevin Comer v. Micor, Inc. Kenneth C. Smith Elliot H. Wagner Barbara Arbucci, and Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2006-02-01· cited 189×
- Joseph Britton v. Co-Op Banking Group, Jeff LieblingNinth Circuit· 1993-09-01· cited 119×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,913 Asset Allocation and Management Company v. Western Employers Insurance CompanySeventh Circuit· 1990-01-03· cited 118×
- Tiffany Hill v. Xerox Business Services, LLCNinth Circuit· 2023-02-03· cited 73×
- C.D. Anderson & Co., Inc. v. Michael A. Lemos, and John LemosNinth Circuit· 1987-11-16· cited 64×
- Arnold v. Arnold Corp.-Printed Communications for BusinessSixth Circuit· 1990-12-03· cited 63×
- Curtis G. Testerman Co. v. BuckCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-11-24· cited 54×
- AtriCure, Inc. v. Jian MengSixth Circuit· 2021-08-27· cited 44×
- Scher v. Bear Stearns & Co., Inc.S.D. New York· 1989-10-19· cited 37×
- Luke v. Gentry Realty, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2004-08-19· cited 37×
- Swift v. Zynga Game Network, Inc.N.D. California· 2011-08-04· cited 32×
- Stewart R. Flink v. Dennis v. Carlson, Goldman, Sachs & Co.Eighth Circuit· 1988-08-24· cited 31×
- Paracor Finance, Inc. v. General Electric Capital Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1996-03-13· cited 29×
- Hobble-Diamond Cattle Co. v. Triangle Irrigation Co.Montana Supreme Court· 1991-08-15· cited 28×
- Letizia v. Prudential Bache SecuritiesNinth Circuit· 1986-10-21· cited 24×
- Wasserstein v. KovatchNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-01-08· cited 24×
- Balkrishna Setty v. Shrinivas Sugandhalaya LLPNinth Circuit· 2021-07-07· cited 23×
- Trott v. PaciollaE.D. Pennsylvania· 1990-10-16· cited 21×
- David v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-04-24· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.