Skip to main content
· 8/24/1988

Stewart R. Flink v. Dennis v. Carlson, Goldman, Sachs & Co.

Citations

  • 856 F.2d 44
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11553
  • 1988 WL 86809

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming district court's stay of arbitration of a brokerage house's claims against the individual representative who was not a signatory to the agreements in question
  • affirming district court’s stay of arbitration of a brokerage house’s claims against the individual representative who was not a signatory to the agreements in question
  • affirming district court's stay of arbitration of a brokerage house's claims against the individual representative who was not a signatory to the agreements in question
  • \[ s] igning an arbitration agreement as agent for a disclosed principal is not sufficient to bind the agent to arbitrate claims against him personally. \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Gibson, Beam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.