Skip to main content

Lester v. State

Citations

  • 628 S.E.2d 674
  • 278 Ga. App. 247
  • 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 890
  • 2006 Ga. App. LEXIS 297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering both the warrant and the affidavit to conclude that the officer provided sufficient detail to identify the subject location despite the fact that the address in the warrant was typed incorrectly
  • state may satisfy requirements of Uniform Superior Court Rule 31.3 by stating at hearing the nature of evidence to be given regarding similar transaction
  • typographical error in officer’s warrant affidavit which resulted in the wrong address being given for the premises to be searched did not invalidate warrant; “other elements of description [were] sufficiently particular to identify the premises to be searched”
  • typographical error in officer’s warrant affidavit which resulted in the wrong address being given for the premises to be searched did not invalidate warrant; “other elements of description [were] sufficiently particular to identify the premises to be searched”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellington, Johnson, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.