Appellate Court of Illinois· 3/24/1992
Leoris and Cohen, PC v. McNiece
Citations
- 589 N.E.2d 1060
- 226 Ill. App. 3d 591
- 168 Ill. Dec. 660
- 1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 414
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing grant of summary judgment to the defendants and remanding for determination of whether the attorney- client relationship suffered a complete breakdown
- reversing grant of summary judgment to the defendants and remanding for determination of whether the attorney-client relationship suffered a complete breakdown
- requiring evidence in the record to support finding of good cause for withdrawal where client’s failure to pay fees or other factors were said to have precipitated a “complete breakdown in the attorney-client relationship”
- complete breakdown in attorney-client relationship is cause for withdrawal from contingent fee case, but quantum meruit fee award still appropriate
- breakdown in attorney-client relationship that results in attorney’s withdraw from contingent fee case still permits attorney to receive fees on quantum meruit basis
- breakdown in attorney‐client relationship that results in attorney’s withdraw from contingent fee case still permits attorney to receive fees on quantum meruit basis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Woodward
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kannewurf v. JohnsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-04-18· cited 45×
- In Re Dennis E. CARLSON, Debtor-AppellantSeventh Circuit· 2001-08-31· cited 34×
- Much Shelist Freed Denenberg & Ament, P.C. v. LisonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1998-06-11· cited 26×
- McGill v. GarzaAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-12-13· cited 20×
- Anil Goyal v. Gas Technology InstituteSeventh Circuit· 2013-06-03· cited 16×
- The Forest Preserve District Of Cook County v. Continental Community Bank And Trust CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois· 2018-06-12· cited 16×
- MUCH SHELIST FREED DENENBERG AND AMENT, PC v. LisonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1998-06-11· cited 14×
- Massachusetts v. Sohmer (In Re Sohmer)D. Massachusetts· 2010-07-20· cited 13×
- Michael Needle, P.C. v. Cozen O'ConnorSeventh Circuit· 2020-02-20· cited 9×
- In re Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., & Lori Peterson Law FirmCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-11-03· cited 8×
- Sigma Companies, Inc. v. RegasAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-09-30· cited 6×
- Matthews v. Homecomings Financial Network, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2008-02-20· cited 5×
- In Re CarlsonN.D. Illinois· 1997-04-24· cited 4×
- Goyal v. Gas Technology InstituteSeventh Circuit· 2010-08-03· cited 4×
- In Re Petition for Distribution of Attorney�s Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., and Lori Peterson Law Firm, formerly doing business as Lori Peterson and Associates.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-11-03
- Carlson, Dennis E. v. Brandt, William A.Seventh Circuit· 2001-08-31
- Houbolt v. County of CookAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-09-26
- Blanco Matos v. Colón MuleroSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2018-05-23
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-03-29· cited 1,536×
- Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court· 1986-02-06· cited 1,151×
- In Re Estate of CallahanIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-08-14· cited 147×
- Rhoades v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1979-10-19· cited 127×
- Reed Yates Farms, Inc. v. YatesAppellate Court of Illinois· 1988-07-14· cited 34×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.