Skip to main content
· 8/31/2001

In Re Dennis E. CARLSON, Debtor-Appellant

Citations

  • 263 F.3d 748
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19411
  • 38 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 93
  • 2001 WL 995340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • establishing that a lawyer has a legally enforceable interest “in a potential contingent fee . . . before judgment or settlement . . . even if he withdraws rather than being terminated, provided that the withdrawal is for good cause.”
  • debtor-attorney's right to, and thus the estate's interest in, a future contingent fee, determined under Illinois law as the \fair value\ of his services as of the petition date
  • discharge denied where documentation insufficient to establish disposition of $65,000 loan proceeds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Posner, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.