Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. Jacoby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that 10 de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, ‘but not 11 otherwise.’”
• denying a motion to dismiss and agreeing that in order to 10 recover treble damages under the TCPA a plaintiff must show that the defendant’s actions “were 11 willful, or made with reckless disregard to Plaintiff’s rights”
• “An agency is required to consider the comments of other agencies, but it does not have to defer to them when a disagreement exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).