LEMUS
Citations
- 24 I. & N. Dec. 373
Syllabus
LEMUS, 24 I&N Dec. 373 (BIA 2007) ID 3591 (PDF) (1) An alien who is unlawfully present in the United States for a period of 1 year, departs the country, and then seeks admission within 10 years of the date of his departure from the United States, is inadmissible under section 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(II) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) (2000), even if the alien's departure was not made pursuant to an order of removal and was not a voluntary departure in lieu of being subject to removal proceedings or at the conclusion of removal proceedings. (2) Adjustment of status under section 245(i) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i) (2000), is unavailable to an alien who is inadmissible under section 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(II) of the Act.
Cited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Herrera-Castillo v. HolderTenth Circuit· 2009-07-27· cited 50×
- Padilla-Caldera v. Holder, Jr.Tenth Circuit· 2011-03-14· cited 38×
- ALYAZJIBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2011-07-01· cited 38×
- Almeida v. HolderSecond Circuit· 2009-12-08· cited 35×
- CHERUKU v. Attorney General of USThird Circuit· 2011-09-22· cited 34×
- LEMUSBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2012-07-01· cited 23×
- Lemus-Losa v. HolderSeventh Circuit· 2009-08-13· cited 20×
- E. W. RODRIGUEZBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2012-07-01· cited 15×
- ARRABALLY AND YERRABELLYBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2012-07-01· cited 13×
- Villanueva v. HolderEighth Circuit· 2010-08-05· cited 6×
- ANIFOWOSHEBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2008-07-01· cited 2×
- Miguel Losa v. Eric Holder, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 2009-08-13
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court· 2005-06-27· cited 1,506×
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court· 1947-06-09· cited 771×
- United States Department of Treasury v. FabeSupreme Court· 1993-06-11· cited 425×
- COELHOBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1992-07-01· cited 405×
- BRIONESBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2007-07-01· cited 95×
- Maria Elena Cervantes-Ascencio v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service and John Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney GeneralSecond Circuit· 2003-04-07· cited 83×
- ANSELMOBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1989-07-01· cited 80×
- Braulio Juan Acosta v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2006-02-23· cited 79×
- Concepcion Padilla-Caldera v. Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralTenth Circuit· 2006-06-19· cited 33×
- RODARTEBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2006-07-01· cited 25×
- Padilla-Caldera v. AshcroftTenth Circuit· 2005-10-18· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.