Lemus-Losa v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expressing the view that the Board should not “equate the unlawful re-entrant with someone who is ‘seeking admission’”
• “If the question before us were . . . the relation between [8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)](C)(i)(I) and § 1255(i) . . . we would agree that there is sufficient ambigu- ity in these provisions to require Chevron deference, and we would find that the BIA has drawn a rational line.”
• “If the question before us were . . . the relation between [8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)](C)(i)(I) and § 1255(i) . . . we would agree that there is sufficient ambigu- ity in these provisions to require Chevron deference, and we would find that the BIA has drawn a rational line.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).