Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1/26/2000
Lefebvre v. Lefebvre
Citations
- 996 P.2d 518
- 165 Or. App. 297
- 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 115
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that an “overt threat is not required in order to authorize the issuance of an abuse pre- vention restraining order”
- explaining that an “overt threat is not required in order to authorize the issuance of an abuse prevention restraining order”
- explaining that an “overt threat is not required in order to authorize the issuance of an abuse pre- vention restraining order”
- assessing the respondent’s obsessive conduct in context of the petitioner’s familiarity with the respondent’s protracted obsession nine years before with killing his former employer
- assessing the husband’s obsessive conduct in context of the wife’s knowledge about the husband’s prolonged obsession with the idea of killing another person nine years prior
- relying, in part, on fact that the respondent “had previously been obsessed with the idea of killing another person” in upholding continuance of a FAPA order
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Linder, Brewer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Vanik-Burns v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-15· cited 23×
- Fielder v. FielderCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-04-04· cited 16×
- Hubbell v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-08· cited 15×
- Valenti v. AckleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-03-05· cited 11×
- Hannemann v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-07-11· cited 10×
- State v. C. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-02· cited 10×
- Holbert v. NoonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-08· cited 8×
- Patton v. PattonMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-08· cited 8×
- Daley v. DaleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-31· cited 6×
- Roshto v. McVeinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-09-13· cited 5×
- May v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-09-19· cited 3×
- H. M. H. v. HessCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-08-12· cited 3×
- V. S. v. SterbaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-05-21· cited 2×
- Murphy USA, Inc. and Mary Frances Maxwell, Mgr. v. Freddie J. Rose and Laureen IrvingTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2015-09-23
- Murphy USA, Inc. and Mary Frances Maxwell, Mgr. v. Freddie J. Rose and Laureen IrvingTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2015-10-02
- Murphy USA, Inc. and Mary Frances Maxwell, Mgr. v. Freddie J. Rose and Laureen IrvingTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2016-10-05
- J. S. E. v. CubicCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-08-12
- M. Z. v. HorningCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-04-01
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Marriage of Strother v. StrotherCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-10-19· cited 18×
- Cottongim v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-12-04· cited 10×
- Loverin v. PaulusCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-05-19· cited 10×
- Fogh v. McRillCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-03-25· cited 9×
- In re the Marriage of KempkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-11-26· cited 6×
- Obrist v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-09-24· cited 1×
- Boldt v. BoldtCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-07-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.