Patton v. Patton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• restraining order was not supported by sufficient evidence—despite the respondent’s “aggressive behavior, his threat to destroy [the] petitioner’s car,” and his stated interest in acquiring a firearm—because the respondent’s behavior was isolated and not persistent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Vanik-Burns v. Burns
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-15· cited 23×
• N. F. M. v. Khalidi
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-11-17· cited 10×
• Daley v. Daley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-31· cited 6×
• Drake v. Alonso
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-05-17· cited 6×
• Kelley v. Stutzman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-10-05· cited 3×
• H. M. H. v. Hess
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-08-12· cited 3×
• I. T. v. Solis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-04-01

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lefebvre v. Lefebvre
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-01-26· cited 21×
• Fielder v. Fielder
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-04-04· cited 16×
• Hubbell v. Sanders
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-08· cited 15×
• Valenti v. Ackley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-03-05· cited 11×
• Poulalion v. Lempea
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-15· cited 8×