Lefebvre v. Lefebvre

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an “overt threat is not required in order to authorize the issuance of an abuse pre- vention restraining order”
• explaining that an “overt threat is not required in order to authorize the issuance of an abuse prevention restraining order”
• explaining that an “overt threat is not required in order to authorize the issuance of an abuse pre- vention restraining order”
• assessing the respondent’s obsessive conduct in context of the petitioner’s familiarity with the respondent’s protracted obsession nine years before with killing his former employer
• assessing the husband’s obsessive conduct in context of the wife’s knowledge about the husband’s prolonged obsession with the idea of killing another person nine years prior
• relying, in part, on fact that the respondent “had previously been obsessed with the idea of killing another person” in upholding continuance of a FAPA order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).