Gehlhausen v. Olinger (In Re Olinger)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[an expansive] construction would result in many plaintiffs being left without a cause of action if they did not have the foresight to require a written statement in situations that normally do not require one.”
• see In re Pollina, 31 B.R. 975, 978 (D. N.J. 1983)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).