Nevada Supreme Court· 8/27/1999
Lee v. State
Citations
- 985 P.2d 164
- 115 Nev. 207
- 1999 Nev. LEXIS 51
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that where the record shows the defendant was otherwise fully informed of the consequences of his plea, he \will not be heard to complain that this information did not come directly from the district court\
- providing that where the record shows the defendant was otherwise fully informed of the consequences of his plea, he \will not be heard to complain that this information did not come directly from the district court\
- providing 2 that where the record shows the defendant was otherwise fully informed of 3 the consequences of his plea, he \will not be heard to complain that this information did not come directly from the district court\
- “[A] district court’s ruling on a pre-judgment motion to withdraw a guilty plea is reviewable on direct appeal from the judgment as an intermediate order in the proceeding.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hargrove v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1984-08-24· cited 302×
- Bryant v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 107×
- United States v. Mohan S. GrewalNinth Circuit· 1987-08-17· cited 64×
- Hubbard v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1994-08-19· cited 39×
- Lloyd v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1978-04-06· cited 35×
- Cruzado v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1994-07-07· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.