Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 2/27/1997

Lee v. Oregon

Citations

  • 107 F.3d 1382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that plaintiffs lacked Article III standing
  • “[T]he ripeness doctrine can be specifically understood ‘as involving the question of when may a party seek preenforcement review.’ ” (quoting Erwin Chemerinsky, Federal Jurisdiction § 2.4, at 100 (1989))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brunetti, Goodwin, King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.