Ninth Circuit· 2/27/1997
Lee v. Oregon
Citations
- 107 F.3d 1382
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that plaintiffs lacked Article III standing
- “[T]he ripeness doctrine can be specifically understood ‘as involving the question of when may a party seek preenforcement review.’ ” (quoting Erwin Chemerinsky, Federal Jurisdiction § 2.4, at 100 (1989))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brunetti, Goodwin, King
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 2,664×
- Colwell v. Department of Health and Human ServicesNinth Circuit· 2009-03-18· cited 146×
- Bova v. City of MedfordNinth Circuit· 2009-05-04· cited 82×
- Lee v. OregonNinth Circuit· 1997-04-16· cited 46×
- State v. LyleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-07-10· cited 28×
- Hawai'i v. TrumpD. Hawaii· 2017-03-15· cited 12×
- Sterner v. United States Drug Enforcement Agency (\Dea\)S.D. California· 2006-10-11· cited 11×
- Metropolitan Baptist Church v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory AffairsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-09-03· cited 8×
- Kemler v. PostonE.D. Virginia· 2000-08-11· cited 8×
- Saulic v. Symantec Corp.C.D. California· 2009-01-05· cited 6×
- In re ParvinW.D. Washington· 2015-09-14· cited 6×
- Western Exploration, LLC v. U.S. Department of the InteriorD. Nevada· 2017-03-31· cited 3×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1999-01-14· cited 1×
- Davis v. Commonwealth Election CommissionNorthern Mariana Islands· 2012-06-26· cited 1×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1997-07-28
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1999-01-12
- State Of Washington, V Irving B. LyleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-07-10
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court· 1967-05-22· cited 6,135×
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 5,797×
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 4,763×
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-01-12· cited 4,651×
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court· 1974-01-15· cited 3,578×
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court· 1991-04-01· cited 2,917×
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 2,028×
- Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 1,370×
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1893-03-27· cited 665×
- The Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. John w.ga Rdner, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareSupreme Court· 1967-05-22· cited 587×
- Toilet Goods Ass'n v. GardnerSupreme Court· 1967-05-22· cited 434×
- Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. WellmanSupreme Court· 1892-02-29· cited 365×
- Wedges/ledges of California, Inc. A California Corporation v. City of Phoenix, Arizona, a MunicipalityNinth Circuit· 1994-05-24· cited 294×
- Charles Laduke v. Alan C. Nelson, Etc.Ninth Circuit· 1985-06-10· cited 261×
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court· 1991-11-04· cited 120×
- Ronald O. Nelsen Michael Bullene v. King CountyNinth Circuit· 1990-02-09· cited 113×
- Freedom to Travel Campaign v. NewcombNinth Circuit· 1996-04-29· cited 78×
- Sample v. JohnsonNinth Circuit· 1985-10-25· cited 62×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.