Wedges/ledges of California, Inc. A California Corporation v. City of Phoenix, Arizona, a Municipality

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that manufacturer of gaming machines could not base due-process claims on the revocation of the operators’ licenses to operate the machines
• holding that “the very participation of the [third parties] in this suit demonstrates that there is no hindrance to the [third parties’] ability to protect their own interests”
• recognizing a legitimate expectation of entitlement where the provision substantially constrains the discretion of the decisionmaker
• noting that a plaintiff alleging a deprivation with regard to her property rights must establish that she has a property interest subject to constitutional protection in order to prevail
• noting that a plaintiff alleging a deprivation with regard to her property rights must establish that she has a property interest subject to constitutional protection in order to prevail
• requiring \significant substantive restriction\ on decision making to show state law procedures create property interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).