Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 6/13/2006

Lee v. Crouse

Citations

  • 451 F.3d 598
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 14509
  • 2006 WL 1617541

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Estelle is distinguishable because it was a capital case”
  • “Estelle is distinguishable because it was a capital case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Hartz, Herrera

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.