Lecaj v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 20 applicant who fails to meet burden for asylum necessarily 21 fails to meet higher burden for withholding of removal
• holding that applicant who fails to establish chance of harm for asylum “necessarily fails to demonstrate the” higher standards for withholding of removal and CAT relief”
• holding that applicant who does not establish “chance of persecution” for asylum, necessarily fails to establish greater likelihood of harm for withholding of removal and CAT relief
• holding that an applicant who fails to establish fear of harm required for asylum “necessarily” fails to meet higher standards for withholding of removal and CAT relief
• holding that an applicant who fails 18 to show a well-founded fear, “necessarily fails” to meet the higher burdens for 9 1 withholding of removal and CAT relief
• holding that where record does not 13 demonstrate chance of persecution required for asylum, it 14 “necessarily fails to demonstrate” the likelihood of harm for 15 CAT relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).