Skip to main content
· 2/23/2012

Crocock v. Holder

Citations

  • 670 F.3d 400
  • 2012 WL 573399
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 3731

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Circuit “retain[s] jurisdiction to review constitutional claims or questions of law raised in a petition for review, including whether an alien is eligible for adjustment of status
  • explaining that, in seeking adjustment of status, alien bears “burden of demonstrating admissibility”
  • explaining that the applicant for adjustment of status “was required to prove a negative,” namely, that he did not falsely claim United States citizenship when he checked the box that indicated he was a citizen or national
  • \making a false attestation on an Employment Verification System Form in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1546 (a) and (b)\ is \a crime involving moral turpitude\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wesley, Lohier, Mauskopf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.