Richmond v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that for aliens who cannot meet the requirements of the exception, “false citizenship claims need not be knowing to run afoul of [section] 212(a)(6)(C)(ii)(I)”
• assuming without 4 deciding that false claim inadmissibility provision has knowledge element
• ʺWe have jurisdiction to examine, as a question of law, a petitionerʹs statutory eligibility for relief from removal.ʺ
• “The negative pregnant of this exception is clear: for aliens . . . who fail to meet those requirements, false citizenship claims need not be knowing to run afoul of [the statute].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).