Leal v. Tombone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that BOP was not required to credit petitioner’s time serving state sentence against his federal sentence
• “The Attorney General, through the Bureau of Prisons (BOP), determines what credit, if any, will be awarded to prisoners for time spent in custody prior to the commencement of their federal sentences.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hunter v. Tamez
  Fifth Circuit· 2010-10-04· cited 33×
• In Re U.S. Bureau of Prisons, DEPT. OF JUSTICE
  Fifth Circuit· 2019-03-14· cited 27×
• United States v. Kevin Aparicio-Leon
  Fifth Circuit· 2020-06-29· cited 22×
• United States v. Efren Madrid, Jr.
  Fifth Circuit· 2020-10-15· cited 14×
• Kevin Dale Woodrome v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2022-02-17
• Fisher v. Holinka
  Seventh Circuit· 2009-03-24

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Wilson
  Supreme Court· 1992-03-24· cited 1,422×
• Tony R. Jake v. G.L. Herschberger, Warden, Adx-Florence, Florence, Colorado
  Seventh Circuit· 1999-04-06· cited 69×
• Pinaud v. James
  Second Circuit· 1988-06-14· cited 51×
• David E. Bloomgren v. Anthony Belaski, Warden United States Bureau of Prisons
  Tenth Circuit· 1991-11-06· cited 49×
• Anthony Del Guzzi v. United States of America U.S. Parole Commission United States Marshal U.S. Attorney General
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-12-02· cited 44×
• Shabazz v. Carroll
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-04-10· cited 5×
• Shabazz v. Carroll
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-11-25· cited 5×
• Buggs v. Crabtree
  D. Oregon· 1998-09-11· cited 4×